In This Article: Learn how Ontario's standardized four-stage workflow guides tasks from creation to completion. This article explains what each workflow stage means, when to use it, how to move tasks between stages, and best practices for maintaining workflow integrity across your team.
Â
What Is the Ontario Workflow?
Every task in Ontario follows a standardized workflow—a structured path from creation to completion that ensures everyone on your team understands where work stands at any given moment. Rather than leaving task status interpretation to individual judgment, Ontario's workflow provides a consistent framework that works the same way across all projects and teams.
This standardization creates several benefits:
When someone says a task is "In Progress," everyone knows exactly what that means
Each stage has specific expectations about what should be happening
Project managers can instantly assess project health by looking at workflow distribution
Ontario automatically tracks status changes, creating a complete history of task progression
The workflow applies to all task types and provides a consistent framework that teams can use immediately without configuration complexity.
The Four Workflow Stages
Ontario's workflow consists of four sequential stages that represent the natural lifecycle of work. Understanding what each stage means—and when to use it—is essential for effective task management.
Screenshot: Workflow Stages in Task Details
The task details panel showing a task with status "Ready for Review" selected. The status dropdown menu is open, displaying available next steps: complete it by moving to "Done," or reject it by returning to "In Progress." The "To Do" option is dimmed since you can't skip backward two stages.
How to Change Task Status
Updating a task's workflow stage is straightforward, but understanding the mechanics helps you work more efficiently.
Basic Status Update Process
Ontario automatically records the status change in the task's Workflow tab, capturing who made the change and when it occurred. This creates a complete audit trail of the task's progression through the workflow.
Status Transition Rules
Ontario's workflow has an important rule: tasks can only move one stage at a time in either direction. This "one step at a time" rule prevents accidental skipping of stages and ensures proper workflow progression.
Here's how this works in practice:
| Current Stage | Can Move To | Cannot Move To |
|---|---|---|
| To Do | In Progress (complete forward) | Ready for Review, Done (skip forward) |
| In Progress | To Do (reject), Ready for Review (complete) | Done (skip forward) |
| Ready for Review | In Progress (reject), Done (complete) | To Do (skip backward) |
| Done | Ready for Review (reject) | To Do, In Progress (skip backward) |
Ontario's interface enforces these rules automatically—you'll only see valid next-step options in the status dropdown, so you can't accidentally make an invalid status change.
Completion and Rejection
Workflow stages can progress in either direction based on what's happening with the work:
Completion (To Do → In Progress → Ready for Review → Done):
- Represents normal task advancement
- Indicates progress toward completion
- Should be the typical path for most tasks
- Happens as work moves through its natural lifecycle
Rejection (Done → Ready for Review → In Progress → To Do):
- Indicates revision, correction, or reassessment is needed
- Not a failure—it's a normal part of iterative work
- Often happens when review reveals issues
- When rejecting a task, Ontario prompts you to enter a reason for the rejection
- The rejection reason is automatically logged as a comment, ensuring clear communication
Communication Tip: When rejecting a task (moving it backward through the workflow), Ontario will prompt you to enter a rejection reason, which gets automatically logged as a comment. This ensures the assignee understands exactly what needs to change without requiring separate follow-up. The required rejection reason creates clear communication and maintains a complete record of why work needed revision.
Screenshot: Workflow Tab Timeline
The Workflow tab displaying a vertical timeline showing task progression. Completed stages (To Do, In Progress, Ready for Review) have checkmarks and timestamps. The current stage (Ready for Review) is highlighted. The Done stage appears dimmed with a dotted connector line, indicating it hasn't been reached yet. Each transition shows the user who made the change, when it occurred, and any rejection reasons logged as comments.
Tracking Workflow History
Ontario maintains a complete history of every status change throughout a task's lifecycle. This audit trail serves multiple purposes: accountability, process improvement, identifying bottlenecks, and understanding how long work actually takes.
The Workflow Tab
Every task's details panel includes a Workflow tab that displays a visual timeline of status changes. This timeline provides a complete audit trail of the task's lifecycle.
| Information Tracked | What It Shows |
|---|---|
| Stage History | Each status the task has been in throughout its lifecycle |
| Timestamps | When each status change occurred, down to the minute |
| User Attribution | Which team member completed or rejected each transition |
| Rejection Reasons | Comments logged automatically when tasks are moved backward, explaining what needs revision |
| Transition Sequence | The complete sequence of status changes, including any completions and rejections |
| Current Position | Where the task is now in its lifecycle, highlighted for quick reference |
The timeline uses visual indicators to make information quickly scannable:
- Checkmarks: Indicate stages that have been completed
- Solid connector lines: Show progression through completed stages
- Highlighted current stage: Shows where the task is now
- Dimmed future stages: Display what stages remain
- Dotted lines: Connect to stages not yet reached
Understanding the Workflow History
The workflow history tells the story of a task's lifecycle. Here's how to interpret common patterns:
Straight-Through Completion
Pattern: To Do → In Progress → Ready for Review → Done
The ideal path—work was completed correctly the first time, reviewed, and approved without requiring revisions.
Single Revision
Pattern: To Do → In Progress → Ready for Review → In Progress → Ready for Review → Done
Normal iterative work—review identified issues, work was revised, then approved on the second review.
Work Paused
Pattern: To Do → In Progress → To Do → In Progress → Ready for Review → Done
Work was started, then put back in the queue (perhaps due to reprioritization), then resumed and completed later.
Reopened After Completion
Pattern: To Do → In Progress → Ready for Review → Done → Ready for Review → In Progress → Ready for Review → Done
Work was completed and marked Done, but later issues were discovered requiring the task to be reopened, revised, and completed again.
Process Insight: Over time, workflow histories across many tasks can reveal process bottlenecks. If you notice many tasks being rejected from Ready for Review back to In Progress multiple times, it might indicate unclear requirements, insufficient acceptance criteria, or a disconnect between requesters and assignees about what "done" means.
Common Workflow Scenarios
Understanding how workflow stages apply in real situations helps you make better status update decisions. Here are some typical scenarios and how to handle them:
Real-World Workflow Examples
See how workflow stages apply in common situations
Workflow Best Practices
Following these practices ensures your team gets maximum value from Ontario's workflow system:
Update Status Immediately
When the nature of work changes (you start, finish, or need review), update the status right away. Don't wait until end of day or until you "finish enough." Real-time updates provide real-time visibility.
Trust the Rejection System
Ontario's required rejection reason ensures clear communication when moving tasks backward. The system automatically logs this as a comment, creating a complete record and eliminating confusion about what needs to change.
Establish Review Protocols
Decide as a team who reviews tasks in "Ready for Review." Is it always the requester? The project manager? A designated reviewer? Clear protocols prevent tasks from sitting in review indefinitely.
Use "Done" Deliberately
Don't rush to mark tasks "Done" just to clear them off lists. The "Done" stage should represent actual completion to satisfaction. If you're unsure whether something is truly done, use "Ready for Review" and let someone else confirm.
Monitor Workflow Patterns
Pay attention to tasks that bounce between stages repeatedly or that get stuck in one stage for extended periods. These patterns often indicate unclear requirements, resource constraints, or process problems worth addressing.
Make It a Team Habit
Workflow effectiveness depends on consistent use by everyone. Make status updates part of your team's daily routine. When everyone maintains accurate status, the entire team benefits from improved visibility and coordination.
Troubleshooting Common Workflow Issues
| Issue | Common Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Tasks stuck in "To Do" for weeks | Assignee is overloaded, task is low priority, or due date is too far out | Review task priority and due dates. Consider reassigning if assignee lacks capacity. Break large tasks into smaller pieces. |
| Many tasks in "In Progress" simultaneously | People are multitasking or leaving status unchanged when switching tasks | Encourage focus on fewer concurrent tasks. When switching away from a task, consider rejecting it back to "To Do" if you won't return to it soon. |
| Tasks sitting in "Ready for Review" indefinitely | Unclear who should review, or reviewers don't know they need to act | Establish clear review protocols. When moving to "Ready for Review," add a comment tagging the person who should review the task. |
| Frequent rejections (Review → In Progress → Review multiple times) | Requirements are unclear, acceptance criteria are missing, or expectations aren't aligned | Invest more time in task descriptions and acceptance criteria when creating tasks. Use the rejection reason field to provide specific, actionable feedback. Consider discussing complex tasks before starting work. |
| Tasks marked "Done" that aren't actually complete | Assignees marking their own work complete without review, or pressure to clear task lists | Reinforce that assignees should use "Ready for Review" when they finish work, and requesters/reviewers should move to "Done" only after verification. |
The value of workflow discipline: Ontario's workflow system is simple by design—just four stages with straightforward rules. The value comes not from complexity but from consistent use. When everyone on your team updates status promptly and accurately, the workflow becomes a powerful coordination tool that provides real-time visibility into project health, helps identify bottlenecks, and ensures nothing falls through the cracks. Treat status updates as an integral part of doing the work, not as administrative overhead, and the workflow system will serve you well.
What's Next
Collaborating on Tasks
Learn how to use comments, file attachments, and team communication features to coordinate work effectively throughout the task lifecycle.
Creating and Managing Tasks
Master the fundamentals of task creation, editing, filtering, and using bulk actions to efficiently manage work across your projects.
Understanding Ontario Notifications
Discover how Ontario keeps you informed about task status changes, new assignments, and comments so you can respond to work that needs your attention.
Comments
0 comments
Article is closed for comments.